Bubbles wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2019 10:51 am I do not see where this is going?
Comparing Maynard and Metson as cricketers both provided periods of brilliance for Glamorgan. Their subsequent periods of employment with Glamorgan were miles apart. Maynard was progressing well as a coach before Russell, Metson and Hamer decided to ,without consultation,employ Alviro Petersen, without Maynard's input as head coach. This resulted in Matthew walking away and at the time the loss of a great prospective talent in Tom followed. Metson was quite quickly moved sidewards and downwards before being shown the door. There were numerous incidents of how Metson was shown to be out of his depth and certainly at that time attracted major criticism. I would say the use of the word" idiot " is mild to say other expletives I have heard.
I know that Maynard is struggling at present but do not see how he can be classed in your eyes as an "idiot"?
Where is Metson now? Is he still involved in cricket?
Where did I say/infer, or " class " Maynard as " an idiot " ?
Perhaps you could now acknowledge that your use of the word idiot was regrettable, and put an end to this rather pointless discussion.
The acid test for a keyboard warrior is simply this. Would you call Metson an " idiot " to his face ?